Our Constitutional Republic - Divine form of Government

In about two months, Americans will do something most people in the world have never done. We will have an opportunity to exercise our power of self-rule in a nationwide election. Lovers of constitutional liberty, however, cannot enter this election period without bringing to mind the remark of Benjamin Franklin after the writing of the Constitution. In reply to a woman's inquiry as to the type of government the Founders gave us, he is reported to have said, "A Republic, if you can keep it." (The Works of W. Cleon Skousen, CD-ROM)

Our Constitutional Republic - Divine form of Government

Our Founding Fathers were well acquainted with republics, at least with two kinds of republics. Both of these, however, did not appeal to them for the American system. Dr. Skousen explains: "The first was the unitary republic, which England was in process of adopting under a limited monarchy. This is a system in which there is legislative or parliamentary supremacy over the government of the entire nation. The Founders had already discovered that 'legislative supremacy' can be as tyrannical as a king; therefore, they rejected this type of republic. "The second type is known as the confederation of independent states; in other words, a 'confederated republic.' Under this system each state retains its independence and sovereign supremacy but confederates with other states for mutual defense or certain other advantages. This type of republic does not have legislative supremacy but rather 'state supremacy.' The Founders had used this second approach in setting up the Articles of Confederation, and it had almost caused them to lose the Revolutionary War. Therefore they rejected this type of republic as well. "What they were seeking was a third type, one that hadn't been invented yet.

"The American Republic Gradually Emerges

"Great Britain had made her major contribution by reducing the autocratic powers of the king and forcing him to share his power with the Parliament. However, the people did not gain the advantages they had expected because the Parliament then became supreme and, to some extent, autocratic. The American Founders thereupon determined to drive the pilings for a firm and sound government clear down where they belonged -- among the people. To accomplish this they had to go through four steps:
  1. "Clearly enunciate the fundamental principle that the power to govern rests in the people. (This was done in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence.)
  2. "Although serving as delegates appointed by the state legislatures, they had to propose a government that would not become operative unless approved by the people.
  3. "To achieve this, they proposed to send the constitutional draft back to the Congress, and if it was approved by them, to have it submitted to the ratifying conventions elected by the people (not the legislatures) in each of the states.
  4. "When ratified, the Constitution would become the voice of the people (not the confederated sovereign states), and would thereby make the voice of the people the supreme law of the land.
"The Founders structured the Constitution so that the doctrines of legislative supremacy (as applied in England) and state supremacy (as applied to the Netherlands, Germany, and the American Articles of Confederation) would be replaced by the doctrine of 'constitutional supremacy,' a brand new invention." (The Making of America, pp. 167, 175) To make the Founders position completely clear, Madison offered a concise definition of a republic in the Federalist Papers as follows:
"We may define a republic to be ... a government which derives all its powers directly or indirectly from the great body of the people, and is administered by persons holding their offices during pleasure for a limited period, or during good behavior. It is essential to such a government that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans and claim for their government the honorable title of republic." (The Five Thousand Year Leap, p. 155)
Only under a Constitutional Republic do the people enjoy the full right of self-rule. The privilege of self-rule has not been had by many people throughout the entire history of the world. Americans must consider themselves an especially blessed people. Under a government of self-rule, it is in the political area where we vote for God's plan of freedom or Satan's plan of slavery. Here is where we indicate whether we belong with the just or the unjust, and whether we are able to overcome the disposition to abuse authority.

The Expression of Self-Rule (Republicanism) In An Election Is Really An Expression of Morality

Dr. Skousen explains what the Founders really meant by republicanism:
"Modern Americans have long since forgotten the heated and sometimes violent debates which took place in the thirteen colonies between 1775 and 1776 over the issue of morality. For many thousands of Americans the big question of independence hung precariously on the single, slender thread of whether or not the people were sufficiently 'virtuous and moral' to govern themselves. Self-government was generally referred to as 'republicanism,' and it was universally acknowledged that a corrupt and selfish people could never make the principles of republicanism operate successfully. As Franklin wrote: 'Only a virtuous people are capable of freedom. As nations become corrupt and vicious, they have more need of masters.'" (The Five Thousand Year Leap, p. 49)
Because self-rule gives many opportunities for the people to give expression to their agency, republicanism becomes a sacred responsibility to be taken very seriously. Pat Buchanan, in a speech just this month reminded us of our responsibility under a republic:
"We have forgotten that, as a nation and a people, we are under God's judgment. We are under God's law. We have forgotten that America is more than her Gross National Product. She is more than the world's largest economy. She is more than the sum of all we buy and sell. She is our country, our home.... We are not just 'consumers'. We Americans are citizens of a republic, sons and daughters of a great nation, brothers and sisters; and we have obligations and duties to one another.... The issue of the new century will be whether America survives, as an independent republic...." (Human Events, Aug. 23, 1996. p. 14)

A Built-In Danger of Republicanism

The Founders knew that willingly turning over power to fellow citizens could lead to those chosen citizens exercising force or control over others in areas not intended. They recognized that almost everyone could develop a love for power once he is placed in a position of public trust. The answer, said Jefferson, is for the people to be jealous and watchful of their rights and to bind public officials by the restraints of a written constitution:
"It would be a dangerous delusion were a confidence in the men of our choice to silence our fears for the safety of our rights; that confidence is everywhere the parent of despotism; free government is founded in jealousy, and not in confidence; it is jealousy, and not confidence, which prescribes limited constitutions to bind down those whom we are obliged to trust with power; that our Constitution has accordingly fixed the limits to which, and no farther, our confidence may go.... "In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution." (The Five Thousand Year Leap, p.164)
Former university professor and noted constitutionalist, H. Verlan Andersen, described human nature in a free republic this way:
"Since almost all of us are unable, afraid, or ashamed to use unrighteous force on one another directly, it is difficult to believe we manifest the disposition to do so in this manner. But when the reins of government are placed in our hands, most of those considerations which deter us are removed. The lack of ability is no longer a problem because the power of government is now at our disposal. "We no longer are restrained by fear because we now have the police power on our side. And since we can usually quiet the voice of conscience by deceiving ourselves into believing that the Golden Rule does not apply to the actions of government, we can quite easily suppress this restraint. And finally we can undertake to exercise unrighteous dominion by doing nothing more inconvenient than voting or arguing for a bad law." "In order for man to exercise free agency, he must have a choice between alternatives. Then only alternative to freedom is bondage, and the only alternative to truth is falsehood. Thus Satan must have the opportunity to tempt us to choose slavery and to believe falsehoods. A government subject to the voice of the people provides us with these choices."

The Slide From a Republic to a Democracy

Nearly every politician, professor, and journalist today uses the term democracy to describe our form of government. While some may use the term innocently, others are accurately describing the headlong rush for emotional decision-making, forced economic equality, unstable law-making, political parties and their national conventions, which always come with turbulent democracies. Against all these the Founders warned us explicitly. Madison wrote:
"Democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths. Theoretic politicians, who have patronized this species of government, have erroneously supposed that by reducing mankind to a perfect equality in their political rights, they would at the same time be perfectly equalized and assimilated in their possessions, their opinions, and their passions."
In the same spirit of the time two hundred years ago, a noted historian, Alexander Tyler, explained why a pure democracy tends to destroy itself:
"A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until [a majority of] the voters discover they can vote themselves largesse [gifts] from the public treasury. From that moment on the majority always votes for the candidate promising the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that a democracy always collapses over loose fiscal policy [taxing and spending], always followed by a dictatorship. The average life of the world's greatest civilizations has been two hundred years." (The Making of America, pp. 254-265)
Insightful religious leaders are warning of the same fate. Gordon B. Hinkley noted, "...tragically, we are experiencing a moral and ethical disaster. We cannot continue the trend that we are presently experiencing, without catastrophe overtaking us." Boyd K. Packer warned, "...we are caught in a current so strong that unless we correct our course, civilization as we know it will be wrecked to pieces." NCCS has been working with local supporters to take the Making of America story soon to communities in Arizona, Alaska, California, Nebraska, Utah, and Kansas. Some of these will involve a number of elected officials and candidates. Hopefully, each of you will see the necessity of continuing your monthly pledges to help us prepare for these major events. Have a great Constitution Week! Sincerely, Earl Taylor, Jr.

Previous Post Next Post